Lunar Features
When
you look up at a Full Moon, at first glance you are met with a bright, white
shining globe. But upon closer inspection, the lunar surface is not as uniform
as it might at first seem. As the Moon waxes and wanes during its cycle,
various features become more, or less, apparent. With the naked eye the most
noticeable are the dark patches which litter the surface; some people see the “Man
in the Moon”, some see a snowman, some even see a basketball player
With binoculars
or a small telescope it is possible to see these darker patches even when only
a slim crescent of the Moon is illuminated. This is due to the phenomenon
called Earthshine. Earthshine is when the lunar surface which would usually be
in shadow becomes illuminated by light reflectedback
from the surface of the Earth. So what are these features and why are they
darker than the rest of the lunar landscape?
Waxing Crescent Moon with earthshine by Mary McIntyre
First of all let’s summarize how the Moon was formed.
Using radiometric dating techniques it has been determined that the Moon formed
approximately 3.5 billion years ago. There were several theories about how
exactly it formed, but the most widely accepted theory today is that an object,
roughly the size of Mars, collided with Earth. This jettisoned out a large
quantity of material which coalesced to form a new rocky body; our very own
satellite, the Moon. The Moon is approximately 3,500km in diameter, i.e.,
approximately a quarter of the size of Earth. As satellites go, it is the largest
in our solar system, compared to its parent body. Because it is locked in a synchronous
or captured rotation, its orbital period is identical to its rotational period.
(This means that the time it takes the Moon to make one full orbit around the
Earth is exactly the same as the time it takes the Moon to rotate on its axis.)
This means that the Moon always shows us the same face. This is referred to as
the near-side. The side that we never
see is commonly referred to as the “dark-side”, but this is incorrect because
during a New Moon, that side is fully illuminated! The correct name for it is
the “far-side”.
First of all let’s summarize how the Moon was formed.
Using radiometric dating techniques it has been determined that the Moon formed
approximately 3.5 billion years ago. There were several theories about how
exactly it formed, but the most widely accepted theory today is that an object,
roughly the size of Mars, collided with Earth. This jettisoned out a large
quantity of material which coalesced to form a new rocky body; our very own
satellite, the Moon. The Moon is approximately 3,500km in diameter, i.e.,
approximately a quarter of the size of Earth. As satellites go, it is the largest
in our solar system, compared to its parent body. Because it is locked in a synchronous
or captured rotation, its orbital period is identical to its rotational period.
(This means that the time it takes the Moon to make one full orbit around the
Earth is exactly the same as the time it takes the Moon to rotate on its axis.)
This means that the Moon always shows us the same face. This is referred to as
the near-side and is shown in the photo on the left. The side that we never
see is commonly referred to as the “dark-side”, but this is incorrect because
during a New Moon, that side is fully illuminated! The correct name for it is
the “far-side”.
We had
no idea what the lunar far-side looked like until the Soviet Lunar 3 Probe
photographed it in 1959. Then in 1968, Apollo 8 beamed back live images as it
orbited around the far-side. More recently the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter
(LRO) has taken much more detailed pictures of the entire lunar surface (see picture on right).
The
far side looks very different than the nearside. This is primarily because the
far side is lacking the numerous darker patches that we see on the nearside.
These are called maria (singular mare) which is the Latin name for seas, and
they cover approximately 16% of the lunar surface. Early astronomers erroneously
thought these dark patches were oceans of water on the lunar surface. They are
in fact solidified lava plains which are comprised of iron-rich basalt. The
iron content makes this material far less reflective than the rocks which make
up the surrounding lunar highlands, therefore they appear as the smooth, dark,
patches. The other big difference between the maria and the rest of the lunar surface
is the number of impact craters present. This gives us a clue about how the lunar
surface evolved.
Soon
after the Moon was formed, the solar system went through a period called the
Late Heavy Bombardment Period. This was a torturous time for the inner planets.
Mercury, Venus, Earth and Mars, and their corresponding moons, were subjected
to repeated impacts by large numbers of asteroids, which resulted in hundreds
of thousands of impact craters being formed. Today on the Moon alone there are
in excess of 30,000 craters visible telescopically, and a good number more visible
from probes or satellites in orbit around it.
The
heavily scarred far-side is how the near-side would have looked following the
period of heavy bombardment period. So what happened to change it? Some
500 million years after the late heavy bombardment period, the Moon went
through a period of heavy volcanic activity. Lava was forced to the surface and
the low lying areas became flooded, filling in many of the impact features
beneath before solidifying into the basalt basins we see today. Astronomers use
crater numbers as a tool for dating solar system surfaces. Evidence that the
Maria formed much later than the rest of the lunar surface, comes from the relatively
small number of craters found within the lava plains. If the maria had been
present at the time the Moon first formed, they too would be littered with
numerous craters just like the rest of the surface. Because the lava flooded a
lot of the lower lying regions, most of the heavily cratered parts of the
surface we see now are found in regions of much higher ground.
As the
Moon moves through its phases each month, different features become more easily
visible. In order to see Earthshine you need a slim Crescent Moon. The best
time to view craters is between Gibbous and First or Last Quarter phases. At
this time, numerous craters can be seen along the terminator (the line between
the illuminated and non-illuminated portions of the Moon). It is amazing to see
a lunar sunrise over a crater. Initially the floor of the crater will be in
full shadow, then slowly sunlight will begin to move along the crater floor,
and as it does so, the long shadows of the crater rim (and its central peak if
it has one) are cast along the floor. Over
the next couple of hours, those shadows begin to shorten and eventually all of
the crater floor is in full sunlight. This effect is shown in my sketches of
the crater Ptolemaeus, showing the differences in crater shadows over a 2 hour
period. This sketch is shown below along with one of the crater Arzakel which
contains a gorgeous central peak shadow.
Maria
become more easily visible the more illuminated the surface of the Moon
becomes, therefore are best viewed when the Moon is Gibbous or Full. During a
Full Moon you can see differences in the colour of different parts of the
maria; if there is more iron the maria looks more brown in colour; if there is
more titanium present in the basalt, the maria will look more blue in colour. The colour differences can be clearly seen in the Full Moon photo above. However, when the Moon is full, there is no definition around the craters or mountains.
One
thing which is apparent at any phase though, is that the higher a feature is geographically,
the more brightly illuminated it is. By far the brightest features are the
peaks of the many mountain ranges found on the Moon. Most of the mountain
ranges are named after those found on Earth. The highest peaks reach a whopping
5km in height, which when measured as a proportion of the overall size of the
Moon, makes them comparatively higher than the highest mountains found on Earth!
The peaks on the Moon are also numerous, for example, there are over 3,000
peaks found in the Appenine Mountains alone. The mountains are best viewed when
they are close to the terminator so the best phase to view each mountain range
will vary depending on their location. If you time it right, you not only see
the brilliantly illuminated mountain peaks, but also the shadows they cast on
the lower lying areas. The best time to observe the peaks of the Alps,
Appenines and Caucasus is around the first quarter/Waxing Gibbous phase as this is when the mountain shadows are most pronounced.
Waxing Gibbous Moon showing the contrast between the heavily cratered southern regions and maria rich northern regions which are flanked by mountain ranges
There are several interesting transient features on
the Moon which are visible for only a couple of hours per month. One of my
personal favourites are the Lunar “X” and “V” which are visible a few hours
before First Quarter. They are caused by sunlight hitting the higher edges of crater
groups and it forms the distinctive shapes. For more information about the
Lunar X and V, together with the times they are visible, check out my other
blog post about them here:
http://marysastronomyblogs.blogspot.co.uk/2018/01/lunar-x-and-v-dates-and-times-for-2018.html
http://marysastronomyblogs.blogspot.co.uk/2018/01/lunar-x-and-v-dates-and-times-for-2018.html
Lunar X & V by Mary McIntyre
So why
are the maria so numerous on the near-side and yet so few on the far side? This
has been the subject of debate for many years. For a long time it was
assumed that the crust on the near-side was thinner, therefore the lava chose
those regions to break through and flood rather than the thicker crust on the
far-side. However, it is now known that the crust beneath the very low lying South
Pole Aitken Basin on the far-side is much thinner than the crust beneath the
largest maria region on the near-side, Oceanus Procellarum (The Sea of Storms).
So the size of the crust is not the only factor responsible for the uneven
distribution of the maria.
It is now
thought that KREEP is responsible for the differences in volcanic activity on
the two sides. KREEP is an acronym, “K” for potassium, “REE” for rare Earth
elements, “P” for phosphorous. It describes the geochemical component of a type
of rock called breccia (a type of rock which is made up from broken mineral fragments)
and basaltic rock. KREEP has a higher than normal concentration of elements
which produce heat, namely radioactive uranium, thorium and potassium, and this
heat would almost certainly affect volcanic activity. So where did KREEP come
from? To understand this, we need to go back to the beginning, and the giant
impact which initially formed the Moon.
This
collision was a huge one, and due to the energy involved, a large proportion of
the material which was jettisoned out would have been liquefied. This formed a
lunar magma ocean. As this magma began to crystallize, some minerals, such as
olivine and pyroxene would have sunk to the bottom to form the lunar mantle. As
the solidification was approximately three quarters complete, the relatively
low density material called anorthositic plagioclase (a mineral which is
abundant in the Earth’s crust) would have floated to the top and formed a solid
crust. This left liquid magma sandwiched in between the two layers. Because of
the process involved in its formation, this liquid layer was rich in elements
which would under normal circumstances be incompatible together, hence the formation
of KREEP-rich magma. The Lunar Prospector Satellite showed that KREEP-rich rocks
were concentrated beneath the vast area of Oceanus Procellarum and the Imbrium basin.
This area is collectively called the Procellarum KREEP Terraine. The
concentration of KREEP beneath thisarea
is almost certainly responsible for the longevity of the volcanic activity
within the near-side regions. The exact mechanisms behind why KREEP would be
concentrated in those regions and not others are still unknown.
So
next time you hear stories about the Man in the Moon, think of the mystery and
the excitement of the real story behind the lunar maria!
Waning Gibbous Moon. This is a great phase for studying craters. You can also see the huge maria area on the left side, Oceanus Procellarum, which has concentrated areas of KREEP-rich rocks beneath the basalt lava plain
No comments:
Post a Comment